<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Japanese Constitution on Keren Wang</title>
    <link>/tags/japanese-constitution/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Japanese Constitution on Keren Wang</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:05:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/tags/japanese-constitution/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>New Publication Announcement: The Legitimation Crisis of the Japanese Constitution - Communication Law Review</title>
      <link>/blog/2021/02/new-article-the-legitimation-crisis-of-the-japanese-constitution/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/blog/2021/02/new-article-the-legitimation-crisis-of-the-japanese-constitution/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Happy to announce the publication of my co-authored article with &lt;strong&gt;Dr. Tomonori Teraoka&lt;/strong&gt; - “&lt;a href=&#34;https://commlawreview.org/Archives/CLRv20/The_Legitimation_Crisis_of_the_Japanese_Constitution.PDF&#34;&gt;The Legitimation Crisis of the Japanese Constitution: Reflections on Japan’s Judicial Rhetoric and Its Post-WWII Constitutionalization Process&lt;/a&gt;” - on the latest issue of&lt;strong&gt; &lt;a href=&#34;https://commlawreview.org/&#34;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Communication Law Review&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;. Our article presents an interdisciplinary, multilingual collaborative effort to critically examine Japanese constitutional discourse at both domestic and transnational levels.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img alt=&#34;Keren Wang and Tomonori Teraoka, “The Legitimation Crisis of the Japanese Constitution: Reflections on Japan’s Judicial Rhetoric and Its Post-WWII Constitutionalization Process,” Communication Law Review, Volume 20, Issue 1 (2020)&#34; class=&#34;aligncenter wp-image-545 size-large&#34; height=&#34;383&#34; src=&#34;/images/uploads/2021/02/legitimation-crisis-1024x577.png&#34; width=&#34;680&#34;/&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Abstract:&lt;/strong&gt; Our article examines the issue of constitutional legitimacy in the post-WWII Japanese &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;legal system. Our analysis proceeds from the judicial rhetoric of postwar Japan, focusing &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;primarily on the state of judicial review and executive legislative practices throughout the &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;Japanese postwar constitutionalization process. The aim of our rhetorical analysis is to &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;identify the main points of discursive tensions as manifested in Japanese judiciary and &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;legislative norms. Although the postwar Japanese constitution provides a judicial review &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;process and separation of powers like its American counterpart, their implementation is &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;constrained by the legislative usurpation of the executive branch and judicial passivity of &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;the Japanese Supreme Court. Whereas the written language in the postwar Japanese &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;constitution adheres to the prevailing transnational dóxa for a democratic rule-of-law &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;society, we find many key constitutional elements are not internationalized within the &lt;/em&gt;&lt;em&gt;operational modality of Japanese judicial rhetoric.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
